Reflections on Framing Literacy 11,
When chapter 8 talks about diagnostic spelling tests my bias immediately emerges.
I could see such a test as useful in the area of phonemic awareness, how ever
I think I would use other means of accomplish those assessment goals.
I don’t believe in spelling as a class except for its possibilities
to further second language learning. As a child I was an exemplary student
with spelling and handwriting woes. I think about certain teachers with
whom I have worked and cringe to think of having to be subject to their
unbending
handwriting edicts.
Other professors have had vendettas against poor spellers, as if somehow
spelling acts as an indicator of intellectual prowess. I am most thankful
for the way my instructors have in most part encouraged the abilities that
they believe I posses, while evenhandedly encouraging my development in those
areas which lag behind. For myself, the computer has acted as a great equalizer
in the area of legibility and spelling. I type almost everything I write,
I also have spell check programs for English, Spanish and Norwegian.
With my own students last year I accepted homework and class work in any
state. What I received should have caused my gradual and permanent blindness.
This year I know that I need to require each student to improve his or her
legibility. Also they need to think about self-assessment in the areas of
spelling / grammar and handwriting so as to edit it at least once before
handing anything in.
Justin