Reading Assessment  Portal  for Teachers and Researchers.    Justin Olmanson

  Welcome to the Literacy Assessment for Diverse Learners Portal!
        


 Home
  Contact us
  Project Laptop
  Volunteer Work

  Our Mission

 Solutions
  Testing
  Research
  Consulting
 itil. Family
  Teacher Ideas
  Lit. Assessment
  Cummins Web
  Lectura
  Bilingual Ed.
 TIE  R & D
  Number Land
  Co-op Inquiry
 Support
  Links
  Bilingual Education
  
Version 2
 News


  

Core Questions Correlated to the TEA Professional Development Competencies


justin olmanson


 

I.  Learner Centered Professional Development

 Literacy to me is the ability to negotiate meaning through oral, textual, and or pictorial devices. Literacy is a vehicle of action and empowerment, preserving history and preparing us for tomorrow’s demands and challenges. Literacy is communication of intent and sentiment.

 

I am an auto-didactic writer and reader, I read in spurts and use the last book I read to lead me to many other books. My self-efficacy is very high, I read for the same reasons I travel: to understand myself more fully. Writing is not a choice for me, I get feelings of urgency to write poems, short stories, bilingual plays, some of which have been published. I wrote for a newspaper for 2 years as well. Writing is not an easy process for me. Slow, edit, write, erase. N. Goldberg’s book Wild Mind has been of great help in freeing myself and seeing myself as a writer in a world pressing obligations. I speak English, Spanish, Norwegian, and am learning French much in the manner of Lomb Kato (Krashen 99). Currently I am reading: Barbie et le secret du pharaon by Geneviére Schurer, Grapes of Wrath by Steinbeck, Angela’s Ashes by Frank Mcourt, and Golf is not a Game of Perfect by Rotella.

 

1.  As a literate person I become empowered to sell insurance, teach, publish poetry, think and write critically. Literacy opens doors for me, helps me rise from the Minnesota factory floor to a chance at a master’s degree and the opportunity to see myself (frames 1 & 4 Mallow and Patterson) as approaching adequate levels of understanding about the educational / literate world (frame 2 Mallow and Patterson) to contribute my own beliefs and observations.

 

As a learner I assess myself as eclectic and highly capable. I learn things quickly and in short periods of time. I learn best when I read first, map it out, and finally talk about it with someone else. My weakness is that I often allow other obligations and joys get between traditional learning and myself. I also handicap my chances at success when I believe an educational task requires more time than effort. I put it off for more stimulating work and inquiry. This leads to eventual crisis management and occasional failure.

 

As a teacher, last year being my first year, I am finally feeling slightly capable to perform up to the standards I have set for myself. I fight to keep expectations high, the pace quick, the environment print rich –as well as diverse-; we as a class strive for community and family, acceptance and encouragement. Individuality is celebrated and Free Voluntary Reading (FVR Krashen 93) is a cornerstone.

 

2.  The strengths I bring to teaching include: my ability to speak 3 plus languages, my impoverished but positive upbringing, my travels to Mexico, Ecuador, Panama, Morocco, Greece, Italy, Germany, France, England, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Spain, and Canada, my enthusiasm for reading, all my past failures in life and teaching, and genetic dispositions towards education and letters.

 

3-4.  I strive to grow professionally so that I may better see and anticipate the needs of my student, to understand early in their time with me how they learn best, to mesh research based methods to my personality. This would be best accomplished through peer and mentor observation, peer and student dialogue, and self-reflection. Yes college courses are important to me; yes, professional development training is vital and valued. I just want to stress other avenues, which also contribute greatly to my success.

  

II.  Learner Centered Knowledge

  

1.  Literacy to me is the ability to negotiate meaning through oral, textual, and or pictorial devices to accomplish some social or individual end. In other words literacy is the ability to participate in a national culture and economy (Baron 1992). Literacy is a vehicle of action and empowerment, preserving history and preparing us for tomorrow’s demands and challenges. Literacy is communication of intent and sentiment.

 

Literacy is a school’s vehicle of necessity by which the lion share of academic principles; axioms, theories and suppositions are conveyed to their students. Those whose literacy lags behind the norm succeed less often, there-by damaging to some degree their ability to accomplish academic and financial goals. The highly literate populous in schools can be found in the honors classes, on the debate and academic decathlon teams. Literacy is a simultaneous separator and equalizer (though more often a separator) (Krashen 1993).

 

Literacy outside of schools usually doesn’t get the recognition it deserves. People don’t realize that when they glance at the newspaper headlines while walking by the newsstand they use their literacy to read the headline, strategies to predict the rest of the story (frame 3) and world knowledge to make sense of it in context with the rest of the world. Most writing consists of notes and lists (though we don’t yet have such a TAAS writing requirement); most reading is made up of street signs and headlines with some light reading on the side (Parrish 1983).

 

2.  Literacy creates boundaries when access to literacy itself is denied or not available, book to student ratios (Elley 1984), economic variables, and linguistic barriers among others contribute to literacy disparity between upper and lower classes, domestic and immigrant populations. Those in power also maintain boundaries in that literacy is a means of maintaining that power and dominance.

 

Literacy acts as an equalizer when it allows economically, culturally, politically and linguistically stratified groups equal access to information. The new knowledge can lead to empowerment through world knowledge (frame 2), goal accomplishment (frame 5) and heightened self-efficacy (frame 1).

 

3.  If literacy is about stimulus, and learning is about changing and manipulating point of view for understanding, then literacy learning requires the learner to be open to the possibility of idea changing input and ideas. It requires the student be ready to discover that previously held notions were wrong. This takes risk taking. Other components that also require risk taking include: the chance one will not understand the input on a semantic or generative-syntactic level, lack of previous knowledge, or lack of perceived relevancy.

 

4.  Initially all literacy stemmed from an oral source, “Language is a completely arbitrary symbol of thought.” (Pei 1965). Past history and tales, practices and caveats passed from generation to generation via vocalizations and repeated listening. Since then the thought of being literate is really the idea of possessing specific knowledge. Is someone educated in all the classics, trilingual, and of great speaking skills any less literate if he or she accomplished all this without the ability to read?  Oral language, reading and writing share in the conveyance of knowledge; they are the servants of intent and power. Neither functions as well without the others as compliment and balance. All are symbols of thought.

 

5.  Prior knowledge is the cornerstone upon which present and future knowledge adheres, it is the buttress of new ideas and the anchor of even the most radical suppositions. Activating prior knowledge allows for meaningful “meaning making” and engaged, interested students (Cummins 1996). Prior knowledge is the bottomless well of writing ideas and the warp drive of reading comprehension.

 

6.  Writers and readers use an array of cueing systems as they make meaning. The first may be graphic cues, pictures which correspond with the text or simply the uniqueness of the word itself in graphical terms, use of grapho-phonemic information, understanding trends in letters and sounds. Syntactical or structural cues, semantic, typological, and morphological round out the cueing systems of which I am presently aware.

 

7.  Strategies involved in reading and writing vary but some strategies seem to remain paramount. The prediction cycle begins with schemas somewhere between sparse and elaborated. To these, input is added and growth and or knowledge occur. This is followed by questioning author, text and self, which leads to a deeper understanding of text, situation, and self. A sense of accomplishment and heightened self-efficacy result.

  • What do I know
  • What do I want to learn
  • What did I learn
  • What do I still want to learn

 

8.  Literacy learners need to know the conventional sound / symbol correspondences of their language –not every detailed exception…- but the phonological generalities. Learners also need to be lead to a morphological understanding that groups of letters stand for groups of sounds which represent thoughts, wants and desires. At the sentence level learners should be aware that there are syntactical and grammatical conventions in language, conventions they have been using since they began to speak and hearing since birth. The most rudimentary or troublesome of which could be at least demonstrated and modeled correctly if not briefly dissected. At the message or comprehension level learners should be lead to the understanding that behind all writing and text, behind all speech lies intent. The importance is to seek that message or intent out and see how it pertains to one so that one might take action if necessary.

 

 Principles Guiding Literacy Teaching

 

  1. Encouraging readers and writers to take risks is important in that, successful readers and writers must take risks to develop. It becomes a beneficial cycle; more risks = more growth, more growth = heightened self-efficacy = an increased willingness to take risks (Mallow, Patterson 1998). Students need to be confronted with success; in turn they will seek out new challenges or risks previously out of their zone of independent achievement.
  2. Eliciting a life-long interest in reading and self-expression should be carried out by giving the learner access to a wide range of literary stimulus as well as cultivating the idea that the book, poem, play or speech is for them to read and reflect, not just because they need to get a grade. Comprehension questions should originate from their own questions and musings. When this is accomplished reading and writing take on the form of inquiry and self-expression, which should in turn encourage auto-didactic reading and expression.
  3. Prior knowledge or schema is the foundation of present interest and future growth and understanding. Activating prior knowledge must be a priority in order for meaningful “meaning making” to occur.
  4. Modeling and teacher / peer self talk demonstration are vital in passing successful reading and writing strategies on to developing readers and writers.
  5. General language structure: phonology, morphology, conventional grammar, syntax and semantics should be modeled and demonstrated through speech, text, and language negotiation self-talk. Unmitigated grammar instruction through drill and practice in most cases produces little results (Greaney 1970).
  6. Knowledge transfer occurs most readily when class requirements most closely resemble life tasks. Therefore reading and writing for purpose beyond grades and stickers allows for transmission of skills to the world outside the practice or academic arena.
  7. Technology should be used cautiously as a vehicle to extract and or compile specific knowledge. Technology may also be an effective tool in encouraging reluctant readers and writers to begin or continue their literary development.

  

III.  Learner Centered Instruction

 Assessment strategies to identify strengths and needs in…(teacher observation / reflection and to some extent portfolio development and conferencing apply to all of these areas).

 

  1. Attitude towards literacy. Metalinguistic Awareness Inventory, Environmental Print Awareness,
  2. Interests. Interest Inventory
  3. Extent and use of world knowledge. Interest Inventory, Environmental Print Awareness,
  4. Speaking and listening strategies. Spelling Analysis, Retellings
  5. Reading comprehension (the product). Retellings, Informal Reading Inventory, cautious standardized testing
  6. Use of reading strategies (the process). Metalinguistic Awareness Inventory, Miscue Analysis
  7. Writing Effectiveness (the product). Rubric for Writing Assessment, Retellings
  8. Use of writing strategies (the process). Metalinguistic Awareness Inventory, Assessment of Writing and Spelling Development, Rubric for Writing Assessment
  9. Metalinguistic awareness. Metalinguistic Awareness Inventory, Student Reflection, Book Handling Knowledge Task
  10. Language structure knowledge. Phonemic Awareness, Assessment of Emergent Reading of Storybooks, Assessment of Sound / Symbol Use, Names Test, Miscue Analysis

 

 

Instructional Strategies to help students target growth in

 

  1. Lifelong literacy attitudes. Free Voluntary Reading / Silent Sustained Reading, Writing Text for Wordless Picture books, Assisted Reading, K-W-L, Response Logs, Book Clubs, Reader’s Theatre
  2. Speaking and listening. Shared Book Experience, Guided Reading, Retelling, Book Clubs
  3. Phonemic awareness. Free Voluntary Reading / Silent Sustained Reading, Language Experience Approach, Writing Text for Wordless Picture books, Shared Book Experience, Assisted Reading
  4. Reading and range of text for variety of purpose. Free Voluntary Reading / Silent Sustained Reading, Shared Book Experience, K-W-L, DR-TA, Q/A Relationships, Request
  5. Writing for a variety of purposes. Free Voluntary Reading / Silent Sustained Reading, Writing Text for Wordless Picture books, Response Logs, Mind Mapping,
  6. Knowledge about reading and writing strategies. Free Voluntary Reading / Silent Sustained Reading, Language Experience Approach, Guided Reading, Cloze, K-W-L, DR-TA, Retelling, Mind Mapping, Think Aloud, Q/A Relationships, Request, SQ3R
  7. Knowledge about language structure. Free Voluntary Reading / Silent Sustained Reading, Shared Book Experience, Cloze

 

  IV.  Equity in Excellence for all Teachers

 

Teacher responds appropriately to diverse groups of learners.

 

  1. When an individual or group of learners receive discourse in a language other than their first language it is vital that a few things occur.
    • Allow for responses written or given in their first language. Second language learners need / benefit from a silent period of 2-5 months. Affording them the opportunity to negotiate meaning through their first language initially allows them a smoother more natural transition.
    • Keep the input comprehensible (Krashen 1999). Contextualized input, pictures, TPR, hand motions, expressions, music and movies increase the chance of activation of background knowledge thus improving the chances for development and learning.
    • Encourage first language improvement. This augments second language growth and placates feelings of linguistic solidarity.

 

  1. When dealing with a range of socio-economic backgrounds it is important that students are not judged on the basis of what they have. The teacher should work diligently to form a community in which all feel a part. The instructor should model or reveal a few areas in which he / she was judged different or not good enough, talking about the hurt and pain it inflicted. Thus building a community of respect and togetherness, using each other’s strengths, not pointing out or poking fun at their weaknesses.
  2. Culture should be celebrated and explored. Very important is the teaching of the ability to suspend judgment when entering / studying a new culture. This pertains to inter-personal / inter-cultural interactions within the classroom. Asking for clarification before jumping to conclusions. “What did you mean by…” “When you said …it really hurt me, I felt like you were telling me… did you really mean that?” Modeling other culture perspectives or case studies is also helpful.

 

  V.  Learner Centered Communication

Professional interpersonal communication skills

 

Strategies to encourage dialogue…

 

  1. The most important lesson is the one that is not said nor introduced nor written on the class rules wall. The most powerful lessons are the teacher’s actions with students, other teachers, and administrators. Refusing to shout or say hurtful things in the heat of a disagreement will serve as a model for students and sets the tone for in-class relationships. Show a willingness to accept compromise from other teachers or administrators and students will begin to understand that not getting their way is neither the end of the world nor the death of their individualism. Giving all sides equal but brief time to voice their desires and perspective allows for a feeling of at least being part of the process.
  2. Assign journal work that involves family ideals and history. This gives children and parents a point of sharing and discovery. Families in which communication is rare will be encouraged to open a dialogue and give a face saving excuse for its initiation. Families in which dialogue is commonplace will find such tasks welcome opportunities for continued growth and understanding. Planning collaborative projects that take advantage of the parent’s expertise are another way in which students and parents can increase both dialogue and respect.
  3. Offer help to those who look like they might need it, ask questions of those who know more than you and share ideas with those in similar situations as yourself. Observe a different class one planning time per week, and use someone else’s idea with your kids each week as well. Be prepared when you speak to administration, understand how your request or question relates to the school…  More than anything, be humble and be patient with first year teachers.

   

 



Reading Assessment
Understanding Authentic Classroom-Based Literacy Assessment
Houghton Mifflin sponsored page featuring Dr. Sheila W. Valencia of the U. of Washington ... read more.

Literacy Dialogue Project      This collaboration between Appalachian State University, Utah State, the University of Georgia and the University of Wisconsin gives students around the country a discussion forum... read more.


Literacy and Diversity

Cummins Web Second language acquisition, BICS and CALP...

Dave's ESL Cafe English as a second language theory and practice...

Crawford's Bilingual Policy Web Solid, comprehensive bilingual ed site...

Literacy.org  En Español  
Penn State University's literacy resource... read more.


This literacy assessment web's aim is to gain a better understanding of how technology can aid in literacy assessment and development. Created by Justin Olmanson, the goal is the optimization of technology utilization in educational settings in hopes of producing more successful learners.


Top of Page
i teach i learn.com © 1999-2003
Educators. Technology. Connected.