Experience with a young child with multiple disabilities.

J. Olmanson

  June 28, 2000

   

1.     The disabled individual.

·        Maria.

·        9 years old

·        Female

·        Parents socio-economic status qualifies Maria for free lunch and breakfast.

·        Maria’s behavior was exceptional, she engaged nearly every person she met on our walk, she also perceived and focused on objects that I had not noticed until I started trying to figure out just what it was that Maria was staring at. She has orthopedic impairments, mental retardation, and almost no speech. Never the less she displays a strong capacity to communicate her interest, and distaste.

·        Maria’s educational background. She spends most of her time in the multiple handicapped room [MHR]. However, during the regular school day she goes to art and music with children her own age. Staff in the department say she gets excited everyday when it is time for her to venture out. In the MHR she works on gross and fine motor skills, as well as special reasoning. She is served by a speech therapist.

·        Maria is part of the multiple handicapped wing of the school where at I teach, Crespo Elementary. She is one of the brightest lights on the entire campus. She encountered me as much as I encountered her.

 

2.     The interaction

 

I chose to take a walk with her to a park, use the swings then lunch. Before we left for the park, I looked at her IEP and talked to the head of the MHR. Ms. Bisset related the incredible progress Maria had made in the two years she had been in the program. When she entered, she could not sit up by herself much less walk or move around by herself. However with the help of physical therapy and a staff that believed in her, and all their children for that matter, she can now walk with the aid of a wheeled walker. I was told that she loved to use the special modified swings at the park, though at first she was terrified of them.

On our way to the park, we passed a few classrooms with their doors closed. She tried to go into each of them. Holding her walker with one hand and reaching for the door with the other. I had to redirect her a few times and we carried on. She would stop to examine things, not necessarily the common everyday things like a kitten outside for the first time, but rather Maria seemed to have an eye for what was out of place. At one point along the trip she stopped and looked up and back over her right shoulder. After a while I realized that she was looking at a florescent light bank in the ceiling, which had burned out and was emitting a red laser like focused light. She just looked and then when I saw it and commented on it she smiled, there may have been no correlation.

Maria did quite well on the slope she had to maneuver. It was very slight, but visually apparent. Also apparent was her excitement for a ride on the swings, with the slope’s aid, she zoomed down and entered the park. As she was lifted into the swing, which had the shape of a car-seat, she adjusted herself to the back of the seat to get ready for lift-off. She smiled and laughed nearly the entire time she was on the swing. A few times she had to be reminded to keep her hands on the chains, it seemed that when she was reminded in Spanish, she responded with more obvious direct action. Her parents speak Spanish in the home, some of the staff at the school are bilingual which means she is directed and stimulated in both languages throughout the day.

After the swings she drove her walker around the small enclosed playground before heading back inside for some eats. She ate strained baby food. Applesauce. Afterwards it was time for her and some of the other students to continue their toilet training. I did not enter the room, as I did not think it proper to invade the privacy of these children.

It would be presumptive to assume the outcome or impact this short period of time together had a specific, significant, or lasting effect on Maria. However, all children thrive when given love and attention, the givers receive in kind as well. Possibly the most probable outcome is that in the future, Maria will see one more person who knows who she is and who looks out for her. It has also acted as a catalyst in that I plan to go back and continue building the relationships, which have begun.

 

 

3.     Personal Reaction.

 

 

Initially I was apprehensive about working directly with an individual who is “different”, that soon gave way to the effervescent personality and beauty of the child. Which is a concern in that had the child been less “cute” and “happy” would I have been as easily engaged? I would like to think that I would have. Interaction with her as well as others in the multiple disabilities room affected the way in which I will think about the MD room. I want to set up an ancillary period for them, or wheel a computer in, I want my kids to read books to them, I want to invite them to our class. I want to stop using words like “them” and start calling them by their names: Maria, Jose, Luis, and Esperanza.

Working with Maria on an every day basis would be equally rewarding as what I am doing now. That is my belief, however I have little on which to base that. Living with her every day would also be quite gratifying, however as the months and years without a break piled up my opinion may develop some asterisks.

Maria deserves to be treated as a child with potential, and abilities. She should be included in the regular classroom as much as possible.  Society should give her the chance to become what she can without automatic relegation to the unseen fringes of society.

This experience has caused me to decide to allocate time and resources to Maria and others like her at my school. This will in turn increase my comfort with disabled people. I think I will increasingly see them as approachable and as individuals.