Instructional Evaluation:  Educational testing and Measurement    Olmanson

  Welcome to the Instructional Evaluation Web
        


 Home
  Contact us
  Project Laptop
  Volunteer Work

  Our Mission

 Solutions
  Testing
  Research
  Consulting
 itil. Family
  Teacher Ideas
  Lit. Assessment
  Cummins Web
  Lectura
  Bilingual Ed.
 TIE  R & D
  Number Land
  Co-op Inquiry
 Support
  Links
  Bilingual Education
  
Version 2
 News


  

 
index         take a quiz on this topic

Instructional Evaluation: Testing and Measurement. 


Group Project  -Linking Instructional Goals and Objectives to Assessment-

Summary:

1. In order to adequately assess the learning and development of a student, you must develop assessment tools that reflect your objectives and how you presented instructional activities related to those objectives. If you do not, your assessment will not be valid, and you will likely arrive at inaccurate conclusions regarding the assessment tools and the students themselves. 

2. Having content-valid assessment measures will help any instructor/teacher when justifying grades if questioned. 

3. Long-term goals are goals that an individual strives to achieve over a long period of time.  Short-term goals are goals that an individual is trying to achieve within the more immediate future.  In general, the short-term goals are used as benchmarks for achieving the more long-term goals. 

4. In order for goals to be useful, they must be specific, challenging, feasible, and progress must be measurable.  In other words, you must set a goal that will challenge someone to adapt or change, you must set a goal that is specific in nature, and the goal must be possible to achieve.  Then, in order to see if one is successful at accomplish that goal, an individual must be able to find ways to measure/assess whether or not movement towards that goal is being achieved over time. 

5. In order for assessment measures to be content-valid, and thus defensible, instructional and evaluation tools must be related to the objectives as set forth by the instructor.  In other words, specific objectives must be established, activities must be designed to accentuate or support those objectives, and assessment tools must be developed to assess the link between student-learning and the objectives selected. 

6. Some instructional goals, and the activities that support them, are very "flexible" in nature.  For example, "The student will develop an appreciation for architectural developments from the 17th century.  There are also "rigid" instructional activities.  For example, "The student will be able to identify the five major architectural developments from the 17th century". 

7. There are essentially two major types of instructional activities that can be linked to educational goals.  First, there are behavioral activities, which are specifically designed to change the behaviors or attitudes of students.  In addition, there are general instructional activities, which are the activities that are designed to make the actual changes. In other words, behavioral activities and objectives are the changes that are sought, whereas the instructional activities are the methods that an instructor utilizes to bring about those changes in general behaviors. 

8. Instructional objectives should be used for a couple of reasons.  First of all, these objectives help to break down the behaviors, and allow an instructor to develop activities that will work towards the actual objectives.  Secondly, instructional objectives allow a teacher to develop more objective measures regarding the degree to which a student as grasped new information and transferred it to behaviors or knowledge. 

9. Societal attitudes and values have a direct impact on instructional objectives.  If there is a general attitude in society that the US in behind in math and science (look at Sputnik), there will be an overall need and demand for schools to focus more heavily on these areas so that we can compete more effectively in the global environment.  If these goals are carried down to the classroom level, teachers will design activities in all subject areas that complement the pursuit of that goal. [graphic]

10.  Writing instructional objectives helps the teacher clarify and organize instruction, which        increases efficiency and effectiveness in both teaching and learning. As the saying goes, it takes time to save time! 

11. Personal computers are very effective at helping teachers in their development of educational activities that are designed to meet their goals. As teachers gain experience with different goals and activities, they may work to alter and improve these objectives and activities so that future students will be better off.  By utilizing word processing programs, teachers may make changes without too much time commitment.  In addition, with the increasing development of the world wide web, teachers have more access to information that may complement their teaching strategies.  Thus, the use of educational software and word processing programs can enable teachers to maintain, write and rewrite objectives in response to the change of instructional goals. 

12. Finally, we hope that this presentation has provided a framework for future learning.  The groups that follow will work to specifically give you strategies about (1) how to actually make useful objectives, (2) how to create activities that are directly related to the objectives, and (3) how to create content-valid assessment tools that will accurately assess the success that your activities related to the objectives.  When you have finished learning about these crucial educational issues, you will be able to design activities and assessment tools that will support your goals, and help develop the students in the ways that society demands.

Resources for further study:

Objectives-Based Testing by Rahmlow and Woodley

Handbook of Classroom Assessment by Gary Phye

A Comprehensive Framework for Instructional Objectives by Hannah and Michaelis

Educative Assessment by Grant Wiggins


Other Resources:

General Instructional Objective Design Issues


   

 



Educational Evaluation Links

The Connection between Cooperative Learning and Authentic Assessment
A folksy, personal account of how to evaluate cooperatively grouped learners... read more.

Validity, Bias, and Justice in Educational Testing. Educational measurement has been historically dominated by technicists who abstract questions of test validity and bias from social conditions, and maintain that everyone should play by the ground rules that they, the technical experts, set.... read more.

Legal Issues in Testing.
Ability tracking, special education, school admissions, test disclosure, teacher competency... read more.

Comments on Assessment in U.S. Education. We do not know much about what assessment has accomplished but we know it has not brought about the reform of American Education... read more.


Research, Software and Theory

Criterion- vs Norm-Referenced Testing
It is common to hear criterion-referenced and norm-referenced testing referred to as if they serve the same purposes, or shared the same characteristics. Much confusion can be eliminated if the basic differences are understood....  read more.

Standard Errors in Educational Assessment: A Policy Analysis Perspective
Statistical methods are tools for understanding social processes, but there is no necessary connection between a statistical method and an empirical outcome... read more.

Hot-Potatoes, Half-Baked Software The freeware Hot Potatoes suite includes six applications, enabling you to create interactive multiple-choice, short-answer, jumbled-sentence, crossword, matching/ordering and gap-fill exercises for the World Wide Web... Read More.


This educational evaluation web's aim is to lead the drive towards integrating education, assessment and IT resources. Created by Justin Olmanson, the goal is the optimization of technology utilization in educational settings in hopes of producing more successful learners. 


Top of Page
i teach i learn.com © 1999-2003
Educators. Technology. Connected.